NFL week-7

SF @ ATL

Sun, Oct 25, 1:00 PM ET · Mercedes-Benz Stadium · Outdoors; forecast not yet loaded

SF @ ATLFREE
Sun, Oct 25, 1:00 PM ET · Mercedes-Benz Stadium

Kicked off. The close and the graded move are on the Results page.

Alert history

NumberAppearedEndedEdge at issue
ATL +3 -118BetRiversOct 23, 2026, 6:13 AM ETOct 25, 2026, 6:13 AM ET+$5.03

Reference

Simulation detail

What the 10,000 simulations produced. Context for the market numbers above, not a recommendation.

Simulation side

HIGH CONFIDENCE

SF -2.5

Covers 50.9% · EV -2.89

Over 49.5

Hits 50.4% · EV -3.77

36SIGNAL SCORE · D

Model lean: SF -2.5. The simulations put it at 52.9%; calibrated against five seasons of results that is 50.9% (-2.89 per $100 at -110). Total lean: Over 49.5, 51.4% model-implied, 50.4% calibrated (-3.77 per $100). The simulations project Atlanta Falcons 23.8, San Francisco 49ers 26.3, a fair line of ATL +2.4 against the market's +2.5. The gap is driven mainly by SF pass offense vs ATL pass defense (-2.5 pts) and SF injuries: WR Mike Evans (Out); DE Nick Bosa (Out); WR Deebo Samuel Sr. (Out); CB Upton Stout (Questionable) ... (+1.9 pts). Confidence is high: inputs rest on 696 offensive snaps this season across both teams, blended with a shrunk 2025 prior and opponent adjusted. Injury adjustment: ATL minus 1.3 points for 8 listed starter(s) (DE Samson Ebukam (Questionable), CB C.J. Henderson (Questionable), CB A.J. Terrell (Questionable)). Injury adjustment: SF minus 1.9 points for 5 listed starter(s) (WR Mike Evans (Out), DE Nick Bosa (Out), WR Deebo Samuel Sr. (Out)). Situational context: spread within a field goal (3 or less), historically +0.1 vs spread (home) (n=1176). Prop lean: Brock Purdy passing yards under 242.5 (projection 234.8, 55%). Signal Score 36 (grade D) measures how strongly and consistently the simulations disagree with the market, weighted by sample size and penalized for gaps larger than the data supports. It is a measure of disagreement, not a proven edge: in a 2021-2025 walk-forward backtest this model's side covered 48.8% against closing lines when the gap was 3 points or more, which is why displayed probabilities are shrunk toward 50%.

How the Signal Score works

Signal Score measures how far our simulation sits from the market. It is a disagreement meter, not a confidence rating. Across 61 graded games A/B grades have not outperformed C/D.

Win probability · 10,000 sims

SF
57.0%
ATL
43.0%
Proj away
26.3
Proj home
23.8

Score margin distribution

10,000 simulated games

SF covers in 54% of sims
ATL covers in 46% of sims
← SF wins byATL wins by →

Outlined bars: 3 and 7 are the most common NFL margins.

Model vs market

MarketModelBookValue sideEV at calibrated prob
Spread+2.4+2.5SF -2.5 spr 50.9%model-implied 52.9%No edge
Total50.149.5Over 49.5 tot 50.4%model-implied 51.4%No edge

Key factors

FactorEffectn
SF pass offense vs ATL pass defense-2.50438
SF injuries: WR Mike Evans (Out); DE Nick Bosa (Out); WR Deebo Samuel Sr. (Out); CB Upton Stout (Questionable) ...+1.905
Red zone finishing gap-1.4037
Home field+1.403122
ATL injuries: DE Samson Ebukam (Questionable); CB C.J. Henderson (Questionable); CB A.J. Terrell (Questionable); LB Divine Deablo (Out) ...-1.308
SF rush offense vs ATL rush defense-0.60295
ATL pass offense vs SF pass defense-0.40412
Turnover margin expectation-0.30696
Strength of schedule adjustment (home minus away)+0.20696
ATL rush offense vs SF rush defense-0.10322

Situational splits

Spread within a field goal (3 or less)+0.1 vs spread (home)1176

Player props

Michael Penix Jr. · pass_yards-2.67
Line
228.0
Model
229.2
Hit %
51.0%
  • Reference line is Michael Penix Jr.'s blended season average; confirm against your book before pricing
  • Positively correlated with team total over and game total over
  • Opponent pass defense weaker than league average (+0.036 EPA/dropback)
  • Game pace factor 0.97x league average
Brock Purdy · pass_yards-14.81
Line
242.5
Model
234.8
Hit %
44.6%
  • Reference line is Brock Purdy's blended season average; confirm against your book before pricing
  • Positively correlated with team total over and game total over
  • Opponent pass defense stronger than league average (-0.024 EPA/dropback)
  • Game pace factor 0.97x league average

Plain-language summary

10,000 simulations project Atlanta Falcons 23.8, San Francisco 49ers 26.3 (home win probability 43%). Model spread ATL +2.4 against a market of +2.5, a 0.1-point lean toward ATL; ATL covers in 47.1% of sims. Model total 50.1 versus 49.5, over hits 51.4%. Largest driver: SF pass offense vs ATL pass defense (-2.5 pts). Efficiency inputs blend all 2026 games played to date with a shrunk 2025 prior and are opponent adjusted.

Graded result

Final
20–29
Spread
cover
Total
under
Close
+2.5